GenAI Use Case Discovery & Scoping
We identify where generative AI can create content, answer questions or speed up work, and define clear success criteria for each.
- Use-case brief
- Success metrics
New Now offering Generative AI & AI Agent development GenAI & AI agent development Explore AI services
Services
Company
Talk to us
AI, Machine Learning & Intelligent Automation
We design and ship GenAI products for content, code assistance, enterprise search and workflow automation, using leading foundation models with evaluation, guardrails and cost controls built in.
What’s included
From use-case design to prompt engineering, safe deployment and cost control, we ship GenAI features your users actually rely on.
We identify where generative AI can create content, answer questions or speed up work, and define clear success criteria for each.
We compare GPT, Claude, Gemini and open-source models on quality, latency, privacy and cost, then design the solution architecture.
We craft and test prompts against your real scenarios, so outputs stay accurate, on-brand and consistent as models change.
We build generation tools for marketing copy, reports, summaries or code that save your team hours of repetitive writing.
Your staff and customers ask questions in plain language and get answers drawn from your own documents and data.
We connect generative features to your apps, CRM and databases through secure APIs, so they fit into daily workflows.
We add content filters, PII redaction and human review steps so your product avoids harmful, leaked or fabricated output.
We track quality, latency and token spend in production and tune prompts and models to keep running costs predictable.
Need something specific?
Why Kramate
We build AI writing and answer tools that your team can trust.
Instead of
tools that sound sure but are wrong
With Kramate
We check its answers against real cases from your business before customers see them.
Instead of: a monthly AI bill that keeps growing
With Kramate: We show what each use will cost and set limits so spending never runs wild.
Instead of: worrying where your files end up
With Kramate: We agree in writing which information the AI may see and which it never touches.
Instead of: waiting months to see anything
With Kramate: You get a working first version fast, so your team can react to the real thing.
Instead of: tools that go stale in a year
With Kramate: When better AI arrives, we tell you and swap it in without a rebuild.
Our approach
You see real generated results early, then we tighten quality and safety before your users do.
6 clear steps 6 deliverables you keep
We agree what your tool should write, summarise or answer, who uses it, and what a good result looks like.
We test a few language models on your own sample tasks and compare quality, speed, privacy and cost.
We write and refine the instructions that steer the model, then show a working draft built on your real material.
We run hundreds of test questions, mark wrong or off-brand answers, and fix the causes before anyone outside sees them.
We add filters, privacy shields and human checks, so the tool avoids harmful, leaked or made-up answers.
We release the feature to your users, then watch usage and spend so running costs stay predictable.
Tools & technologies
We pick models and tooling around your content, cost and privacy needs.
Expert guide
Generative AI development services design and build software that produces text, images, code or structured answers using large models, then connect that software to your own content and systems. The work is mostly engineering around the model: retrieving the right information, controlling what the model may do, checking its output and keeping costs predictable.
A first demo is quick. A dependable feature is not, because generated output can be fluent and still wrong. That gap between demo and production is where generative AI development services earn their fee.
This guide walks through model choices, a build pipeline, evaluation, security, running costs and regional rules for the USA, UK, Australia and Singapore, then explains how to select a team and how Kramate works.
Typical deliverables fall into a handful of patterns, each with different risks.
Not every language task needs a large model. Some are handled better by classic NLP techniques that are cheaper and more predictable.
The model decision shapes cost, privacy and control. Hosted models are called over an API, and open-weight models can be run in your own environment.
| Factor | Hosted API | Open weights you run |
|---|---|---|
| Setup effort | Low | Higher: hosting, scaling and updates are yours |
| Data location | Governed by the provider’s terms and region options | Stays in your environment |
| Quality ceiling | Often strongest on broad tasks | Can match on narrow tasks, especially when adapted |
| Cost shape | Pay per use | Infrastructure plus engineering time |
| Switching | Needs an abstraction layer | Full control over the version |
Provider documentation such as the OpenAI API documentation (opens in a new tab), Claude documentation (opens in a new tab) and Meta’s Llama resources (opens in a new tab) describe capabilities, limits and usage terms. Hugging Face documentation (opens in a new tab) covers many open models. Build so that a model can be swapped, because the best option changes, and connect the feature to existing tools through AI integration.
Traditional tests compare an exact result. Generative output varies, so teams build an evaluation set: a collection of real questions with reference answers or scoring rules, drawn from your own material. Each change to a prompt, model or document set is re-run against it.
Useful checks include whether answers are supported by retrieved sources, whether the system declines when it lacks information, and whether outputs follow the required format. Automated scoring by another model can help at scale, but sampled human review remains necessary. No partner can responsibly promise an accuracy figure before testing on your data.
The OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications (opens in a new tab) lists risks specific to these systems, including prompt injection, insecure handling of model output and sensitive information disclosure. Prompt injection means hostile text, hidden in a web page or document, tries to override the system’s instructions.
The NIST AI Risk Management Framework (opens in a new tab) and vendor guidance such as Microsoft’s responsible AI resources (opens in a new tab) help structure reviews of fairness, transparency and accountability.
Build cost for generative AI development services depends on integrations, content preparation, evaluation effort and security needs. Run cost is different: hosted models usually bill by tokens, the small units of text processed in each request and response. Long documents, long conversations and frequent calls all increase usage.
Common commercial models are a fixed price for a defined first release, a dedicated team for continuing product work, and hourly support for experiments.
These are illustrative examples, not Kramate results.
Ask where model providers process data and whether regional hosting is available, then confirm obligations with legal counsel. If you serve EU residents, the EU AI Act resource (opens in a new tab) tracks that law’s obligations.
After a free consultation you receive a detailed estimate within 24 hours, under an NDA signed before detailed discussions. Work runs in two-week rounds, each closing with a demo of working software, and a named project manager shares daily Slack or Teams updates. Contracts can be fixed-price, dedicated-team or hourly, and the client receives full ownership of all intellectual property. See our delivery approach for the stages. Teams practice least-privilege access, encrypted devices and peer review of all code.
Define the task and what counts as a good answer, prepare permission-checked content, ground the model in it, add guardrails, wrap it in a real product with logging, then test against an evaluation set and launch in stages.
Proprietary hosted models are quicker to start and often strong on broad tasks. Open-weight models give more control over data location and cost at scale but need engineering to host. Many teams design so either can be used.
Ground answers in retrieved sources, show citations, restrict the scope, instruct the model to decline when unsure, test on real questions and keep human review for important outputs. Errors can be reduced but not removed.
It is an attack where text in a document, email or web page contains instructions meant to hijack the model. Defenses include separating trusted instructions from untrusted content, limiting tool permissions and validating outputs.
It can be, if you choose providers whose terms fit your data, restrict what is sent, enforce user permissions and log access. Review each vendor’s retention and training policies, and involve security and legal teams early.
Hosted models charge by usage, so longer prompts, bigger documents and busier periods raise bills. Caching repeated answers, using smaller models for easy tasks and setting spend alerts all keep monthly costs predictable and easy to forecast.
FAQ
Main factors are the type of output (text, images, code), the foundation model used, how much of your data it must draw on, usage volume, safety filters, interface work and evaluation effort. Per-request model fees continue after launch, so we plan those with you.
Work usually moves from use-case selection to a prototype, prompt and workflow refinement, evaluation, safety checks and staged release. Timelines differ based on output quality demands, number of data sources, review steps needed and how fast your team gives feedback on early results.
You own the application code, prompts, workflows and evaluation sets we deliver, as Kramate transfers IP to clients after signing an NDA before detailed talks. Ownership of AI-generated content can depend on local law and model terms, so we flag those points early.
Yes. We add generation features through APIs into your existing app, content tools or internal workflows. Users stay in familiar screens, with drafts, summaries or answers appearing where they work, and with human review steps where your process needs them.
Compare models on your own sample tasks, not general rankings. Weigh output quality, speed, cost per request, data handling terms, and language support. We build the app so the model can be swapped later, which limits lock-in as the market changes.
We ground answers in your trusted documents, constrain the task, ask the model to cite sources, and add checks before output reaches users. We also test with tricky questions and keep a human review step for high-stakes content. Risk falls but never disappears entirely.
Common mistakes include starting with a tool instead of a problem, skipping evaluation, feeding messy documents to the model, ignoring data privacy, and underestimating running costs. We address these early with clear success measures, test sets and a plan for monitoring after launch.
Tell us about your project and get a free consultation and estimate within 24 hours.
NDA on request You own the IP No obligation Free estimate
A solutions consultant will reply within one business day with next steps.
Tell us about your project and we’ll reply within one business day. Fields marked * are required.
We couldn’t send your message just now. Please try again, or email us at hello@kramate.com.