Data Volume & Workload Assessment
We profile your data growth, query patterns and latency needs, so the platform is sized for real load, not guesses.
- Workload analysis
- Capacity plan
New Now offering Generative AI & AI Agent development GenAI & AI agent development Explore AI services
Services
Company
Talk to us
Data & Analytics
We engineer distributed processing on Spark, Kafka and data lake storage, tuned for throughput and cost, so large batch and event workloads finish reliably as volumes grow.
What’s included
We architect and build Spark, Kafka and distributed storage platforms that handle terabytes without slowing your business down.
We profile your data growth, query patterns and latency needs, so the platform is sized for real load, not guesses.
We design Hadoop-compatible and cloud object storage layers with partitioning and tiering that keep storage costs in check.
We build and tune Spark applications for batch transformation and analytics, cutting multi-hour jobs to runs your team can rely on.
We implement Kafka topics, producers and consumers that capture events from apps and devices as they happen.
Processed data lands in Cassandra, MongoDB or your warehouse, so analysts and applications query it without extra work.
We apply encryption, authentication and audit logging across the cluster to protect sensitive records at scale.
We deploy on EMR, Databricks or Kubernetes with autoscaling, so capacity follows demand and idle spend drops.
We watch job health, resolve bottlenecks and tune resources every month so the platform stays fast as data grows.
Need something specific?
Why Kramate
We size things to what you really have, and we do not sell you a bigger system than you need.
Instead of
paying for a giant system you never fill
With Kramate
We measure your actual data and growth first, then size the plan to fit.
Instead of: paying full price for machines sitting idle
With Kramate: You only pay for the power you use, and we show you the monthly bill.
Instead of: meetings full of terms you cannot follow
With Kramate: We explain what each part does for your business, and we leave the jargon out.
Instead of: worrying who can open customer information
With Kramate: We lock access down from the first day, and a second person checks all the work.
Instead of: a system with nobody watching it
With Kramate: We watch it for you, and our support plans include around-the-clock cover where you need it.
Our approach
We make very large data sets fast to store, search and study.
7 clear steps 7 deliverables you keep
We measure how much data you create each day, where it comes from and what you do with it.
We plan a large shared store where raw data lands first, then gets sorted for use.
We build jobs, often on Spark, that crunch huge files in parallel so answers arrive in minutes, not days.
We join the new store to your databases, live event feeds and reporting tools.
We set rules for who may read or change each data set, and record who did.
We switch on the cluster in the cloud so it grows when work is heavy and shrinks when quiet.
We track job times and costs, and speed up the slowest tasks as your data grows.
Tools & technologies
We choose distributed tools sized to your data volume, latency needs and cloud budget.
Expert guide
Big data development services design and build systems that store and process data too large, too fast or too varied for a single database server. They typically combine distributed storage, batch and stream processing engines, and open table formats, running on cloud or on-premises clusters.
The honest first question is whether you need any of that. Many businesses with impressive-sounding datasets are served better by a well-tuned warehouse, and distributed systems add operating cost, new skills to hire and more places for failures to hide.
This guide gives a practical scale test, explains what Spark, Kafka, Flink and Iceberg each do, discusses architecture patterns, security, regional rules in the USA, UK, Australia and Singapore, and the levers that keep cluster costs under control.
The usual description of big data is volume, velocity and variety. The NIST Big Data Interoperability Framework (opens in a new tab) uses these characteristics to define what makes a system a big data system. Use them as a checklist rather than a label.
If the answer is no across the board, consider a cloud data warehouse first. If you answer yes to one or two, you probably need distributed processing for that workload only.
Big data development services span the whole path from raw events to usable results: ingesting data from applications, devices and files, storing it cheaply at scale, processing it in batch or as streams, exposing curated tables to analysts, and operating the platform with monitoring and cost controls.
It also includes the unglamorous parts that decide success: file layout and partitioning, schema management, retention policies, access control and a plan for replaying data after a bug.
Open source tools in this space are building blocks. Each does one job well, and most architectures combine several.
| Technology | Primary job | Use it when |
|---|---|---|
| Apache Spark (opens in a new tab) | Distributed batch processing, SQL and machine learning on large datasets | Transforming or training on data that exceeds one machine |
| Apache Kafka (opens in a new tab) | A durable log that carries event streams between systems | Many services need the same events, with replay ability |
| Apache Flink (opens in a new tab) | Stateful stream processing with event-time handling | Continuous computation such as windows, joins and alerts |
| Apache Iceberg (opens in a new tab) | An open table format for large analytic tables on object storage | You want warehouse-like tables, schema changes and time travel on a lake |
Managed platforms such as Databricks (opens in a new tab) bundle several of these. They reduce operations work but tie costs and features to a vendor, so compare them with self-managed options.
A data lake stores raw files in cheap object storage and offers flexibility at the price of governance work. A warehouse offers structured, fast, governed tables. A lakehouse applies table formats such as Iceberg so one copy of data serves both purposes.
A common design lands raw data first, refines it through cleaned and business-ready layers, and keeps each layer reproducible from the one before it. Streaming and batch paths should share business logic where possible, to avoid two sets of numbers. See real-time analytics solutions for the streaming side.
Large platforms collect wide, long-lived copies of data, which raises the stakes. Encrypt storage and network traffic, give each job and person only the access needed, separate production from experiments, and log access to sensitive datasets.
Catalog what you hold and why (a master data management effort can help with core entities), set retention periods, and make deletion workable: open table formats can support row-level deletes, but you must plan for them. For encryption and key practices, see data security and encryption services.
Idle clusters waste money and energy. Favor autoscaling, shut down interactive clusters when unused, store data in compressed columnar formats, process only new or changed data, and retire datasets nobody uses.
The cheapest computation is the one you avoid: sampling for exploration, pruning partitions and caching repeated results all reduce work.
These are illustrative examples, not Kramate client results.
Big platforms often replicate data across regions for resilience, which can conflict with residency and transfer rules. Confirm with legal counsel.
Pick cloud regions deliberately, document replication paths, and ask whether support staff can view production data from another country.
Two budgets exist: building the platform and running it. Running cost often surprises teams because it scales with usage.
Set a cost alert per workload, tag resources by team and review spend monthly. Begin with one workload that justifies the platform and prove its economics before migrating others.
Discussions start under an NDA. After a free consultation we return a detailed estimate within 24 hours, offered as fixed-price, dedicated-team or hourly. Your dedicated project manager posts daily on Slack or Teams, and every two weeks we demonstrate progress. You receive all intellectual property, and our engineers can lead or join your team. Read about our approach.
Only if one well-tuned warehouse or database cannot handle your volume, event rate or variety of data. Measure first. Many organizations are better served by a cloud warehouse and add distributed tools for a specific workload.
Spark excels at large batch processing, SQL and machine learning, and also supports streaming. Flink is designed around continuous, stateful stream processing with careful handling of event time. Many teams use Spark for batch and Flink for streams.
A lake stores raw files cheaply, a warehouse offers governed, fast structured tables, and a lakehouse adds table formats so one copy of data serves both. Your mix of data types and users should drive the choice.
Iceberg is an open table format that organizes files in object storage into tables with schema evolution, snapshots and time travel. Multiple engines can read the same tables, which helps avoid lock-in.
Turn off idle clusters, autoscale, store compressed columnar files, process only changed data, fix small-file and skew problems, tag spending by team and review it monthly. Remove datasets nobody uses.
They are volume, velocity, variety, veracity and value. The first three describe size, speed and diversity, while veracity concerns trustworthiness and value concerns whether the data answers a worthwhile question for the business.
FAQ
Data volume, velocity and the number of sources drive the price most. Other factors are the tools involved, such as Spark, Kafka or cloud storage, plus how much processing logic you need. Retention rules, security needs, and how many teams will query the platform also change the effort. We give a no-obligation estimate within 24 hours.
A typical build runs through discovery, architecture, ingestion, processing, testing and handover. Duration depends on how many sources you connect, how messy the data is and how fast your team approves decisions. A first working pipeline often comes earlier than the full platform, so you can see value in stages.
You own them. Kramate signs an NDA before detailed discussions, and the pipelines, job code, schemas and documentation transfer to you at handover. Your data stays in your cloud accounts, so we never hold it. That keeps access, audit trails and ownership clear from day one.
Yes. We build on the cloud account and tools you already use, whether that is AWS, Azure or GCP, and connect to existing databases and BI tools. We agree naming, access and deployment conventions first, so your engineers can read, run and extend what we deliver.
You need them when data no longer fits on one machine, arrives continuously, or takes too long to process in batches. If your data is modest, a standard warehouse is simpler and cheaper to run. We check your real volumes before recommending distributed tools.
Prepare a list of data sources, rough volumes, the questions you want answered and who will use the results. Access to sample data helps a lot. Know your retention and privacy rules too. Even partial answers let us scope the work and spot risks early.
Look at pipeline reliability, data freshness, processing time against your needs, and cost per workload. Check that users can reach trusted results without waiting. We set these measures with you at the start and add monitoring and alerts, so problems are visible before users notice.
Tell us about your project and get a free consultation and estimate within 24 hours.
NDA on request You own the IP No obligation Free estimate
A solutions consultant will reply within one business day with next steps.
Tell us about your project and we’ll reply within one business day. Fields marked * are required.
We couldn’t send your message just now. Please try again, or email us at hello@kramate.com.