Text Data Audit & NLP Scoping
We review your documents, tickets and messages to pick NLP tasks that remove manual reading and deliver measurable savings.
- Corpus audit
- Use-case scope
New Now offering Generative AI & AI Agent development GenAI & AI agent development Explore AI services
Services
Company
Talk to us
AI, Machine Learning & Intelligent Automation
We turn emails, tickets, contracts and reviews into structured insight with classifiers, entity extraction, summarisation and sentiment models fitted to your domain language.
What’s included
We build NLP pipelines that read, classify and summarise your documents, emails and conversations, then plug them into your workflows.
We review your documents, tickets and messages to pick NLP tasks that remove manual reading and deliver measurable savings.
We route emails, tickets and requests automatically by topic, urgency or intent, so your teams answer the right items first.
We pull names, dates, amounts and clauses from contracts, invoices and reports into structured fields without retyping.
Long reports, calls and case files become short, accurate summaries that let your staff decide faster.
We analyse reviews, surveys and support chats to surface what customers like and dislike, tracked over time.
We build search and translation across the languages your customers use, so content works in every market you serve.
We connect NLP services to Salesforce, Zendesk or your own apps so results appear where your team already works.
We measure precision and recall on your data, then retrain as language, products and terminology change.
Need something specific?
Why Kramate
We turn your piles of emails and documents into answers your team can use.
Instead of
tools trained on strangers' writing
With Kramate
We learn from your emails, forms and tickets so it understands your own terms.
Instead of: tools that only get English right
With Kramate: We test it with real messages in each language your customers write in.
Instead of: wrong answers slipping through unseen
With Kramate: When it is unsure, it passes the item to your staff instead of guessing.
Instead of: yet another screen to check
With Kramate: We connect it to the tools your staff already open every day.
Instead of: accuracy that fades over time
With Kramate: We recheck it on fresh examples now and then and fix it when needed.
Our approach
We teach software to read your documents and messages, then check its reading against your own staff.
7 clear steps 7 deliverables you keep
We read through your emails, tickets or contracts to see what language you use and which jobs take staff the longest.
We agree what the software should find or sort, such as topics, names, dates or customer mood.
Your experts and ours mark up a set of real examples, which the software learns from.
We train and compare a few approaches on your labelled text, and show which reads your content best.
We score its answers against your team on fresh documents, and list the kinds of text it still misreads.
We link the results to your helpdesk, CRM or document store, so staff see them where they already work.
We review mistakes after launch and retrain as your products, wording and customers change.
Tools & technologies
We combine proven language libraries with modern models, chosen per language and task.
Expert guide
NLP development services build software that reads, sorts, searches and understands human language in emails, documents, chats, reviews and recorded calls. Natural language processing turns unstructured text into fields, labels, answers and alerts that other systems can use.
Large language models have widened what is possible, yet many business text tasks are still better served by smaller, cheaper and more predictable models, or by a mix. The right choice depends on the task, the language, the volume and the cost of errors.
This guide maps common text tasks to techniques, explains how quality is measured, covers languages and privacy, and sets out what to ask when evaluating NLP development services for work in the USA, UK, Australia and Singapore.
The same business goal can be met several ways. This table shows common tasks and the usual approach, which a partner should justify for your case.
| Task | What it does | Typical approach |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | Routes tickets, tags topics, flags sentiment | Fine-tuned compact model, or an LLM with examples |
| Entity extraction | Pulls names, dates, amounts and clauses from text | Trained extraction model, rules, or a model with a fixed output format |
| Semantic search | Finds passages by meaning, not exact words | Embeddings and a vector or hybrid index |
| Summarization | Condenses long text | Large language model with review |
| Speech to text | Transcribes calls and meetings | Speech recognition model plus cleanup |
| Translation | Converts between languages | Machine translation with human checks for key content |
For generative drafting and question answering over your content, generative AI development is the related service.
A large language model handles many tasks with a prompt and few examples, which speeds up prototypes. A smaller model trained for one task can be cheaper per document, faster, simpler to host privately and more consistent. Rules still win for rigid formats such as tax numbers.
Many production systems combine them: rules for fixed patterns, a compact classifier for routing, and a large model only for hard cases. Model hubs such as Hugging Face (opens in a new tab) document thousands of open language models, and provider references such as the Azure AI documentation (opens in a new tab) cover hosted language services.
Quality varies widely by language. For a stream of incoming documents, pair NLP with workflow automation so results reach the right system. English is best supported, while many other languages, dialects and mixed-language writing have weaker coverage. Singapore and Australia are good reminders: local expressions, code-switching and industry slang can confuse models trained on general text.
Two measures matter for most NLP systems. Precision asks how many of the items the system flagged were correct. Recall asks how many of the items it should have flagged it found. Raising one often lowers the other, so choose the balance using the cost of each type of error.
Build a labeled test set from your own text and keep it separate from training. Report results by category, language and channel. Generated outputs such as summaries need sampled human review, and low-confidence results should go to a person. The NIST AI Risk Management Framework (opens in a new tab) and the OECD AI Principles (opens in a new tab) both emphasize accountability and human oversight. Nobody can promise a quality figure before testing on your documents.
Text often contains names, health details, account numbers and opinions. Redact or mask sensitive fields before analysis where possible, limit who can see raw text, and check where each model service processes it. The ICO’s AI and data protection guidance (opens in a new tab) is a helpful reference on lawful basis and minimization.
Confirm details with legal counsel, especially for recorded calls and cross-border processing.
These are illustrative examples, not Kramate client results.
Cost follows the number of tasks and languages, the labeling effort, document volume and variety, accuracy needs, integration with existing systems and hosting. Per-document processing fees for hosted models grow with volume, so estimate monthly usage early.
Start with a pilot on a sample of real documents, compare approaches on the same test set, then scale the one that balances quality and cost. Fixed price fits the pilot, and a dedicated team suits a growing portfolio of text tasks.
Begin with a free consultation; a detailed estimate follows within 24 hours, and an NDA is agreed before you share sample documents. A project manager is assigned to your work, you receive daily Slack or Teams updates, and each two-week round closes with a demo. Fixed-price, dedicated-team and hourly options exist, and intellectual property passes to you. Kramate can lead delivery or embed with your team, as set out in our approach.
Common uses include sorting emails and tickets, extracting data from documents, searching knowledge bases by meaning, analyzing reviews, transcribing calls and drafting summaries. Each reduces manual reading and typing for staff, and each can start small with one document type before expanding to others.
NLP is the whole field of computers working with language. A large language model is one kind of NLP model, flexible but costlier. Many tasks suit smaller specialized models or rules, and production systems often mix all three.
Convert files to text, using OCR for scans, then apply a trained extraction model, rules or a language model with a fixed output format. Validate fields against business rules and route doubtful results to a person.
Use a labeled test set from your own text and report precision and recall per category, plus language and channel. For generated text, add sampled human review against written criteria.
Often, but support is uneven. Test each language and dialect separately, include local vocabulary in samples, and consider human review for languages with weaker model coverage or specialized industry vocabulary.
Mask or redact sensitive fields before processing, limit access to raw text, choose processing locations deliberately, set retention limits and document your lawful basis for processing. Confirm requirements with legal counsel in each country.
FAQ
Price depends on the NLP task (classification, entity extraction, summarisation, sentiment), languages, text volume, how much labelled data exists, accuracy needs, use of large language models versus smaller models, and integration. Domain-specific text such as legal or medical content needs more tuning.
They normally go through text sampling and requirement setting, labelling, model building, testing against real documents and deployment. Timing is affected by text quality, number of languages, labelling effort and how the results must feed other systems.
Yes. Kramate signs an NDA before detailed discussions and transfers trained models, annotation guidelines, labelled data, processing code and documentation to you. Your text data stays confidential and is not used to train models for other customers.
Yes. We expose NLP as an API or batch process that reads from your inbox, ticket system, document store or database and writes results back. Your teams keep their tools while tagging, routing or summarising happens in the background.
Large language models handle varied language with little setup but cost more per request. Smaller models can be faster, cheaper and easier to run privately for fixed tasks like tagging. We test both on your text and recommend based on accuracy, speed and running cost.
Yes, with care. We check language coverage on your own samples and adapt models with domain terms, abbreviations and examples. Accuracy can vary by language, so we measure each one separately instead of assuming results carry over.
We label a sample of your real text, keep it separate from training, and score the model on it using measures suited to the task, such as precision and recall for entity extraction. Reviewing errors with your team shows which mistakes matter most.
Tell us about your project and get a free consultation and estimate within 24 hours.
NDA on request You own the IP No obligation Free estimate
A solutions consultant will reply within one business day with next steps.
Tell us about your project and we’ll reply within one business day. Fields marked * are required.
We couldn’t send your message just now. Please try again, or email us at hello@kramate.com.